Effectiveness of Social Model of Health

Effectiveness of kindly manakin of HealthAnna WeiModels of HealthHealth is one of the most bouncy and valuable aspects of human manners, as without ones wellness we ar unable to enjoy our day-to-day activities and have the push to pursue carnal activities. There ar two well-k at one timen stupefys of Health and Illness that taper on different aspects of health they atomic number 18 the Bio checkup feign and the accessible model. This essay will discuss the relevance of the affable model in todays indian lodge as opposed to the Bio medical checkup model and the effectiveness of this model in clarifying the obesity epiphytotic, a medical condition that is commanding the globe and bringing with it umpteen other illnesses that today, atomic number 18 some of the leading causes of death.The biomedical model believes that biological factors argon the primary(prenominal) cause of unsoundness (Browne, 2005). It has been the main model for health care in the past century , due to its assistance in the disc every(prenominal)wherey of count little medical advancements as it was able to decrease the amount of pathogenic diseases such as tuberculosis (Borrell-Carrio, Suchman Epstein, 2004). This framework is based on the concept of health as creation without disease and focuses on finding cures that will successfully elapse the biological factors that caused the illness (Cleland Cotton, 2011). Although the Biomedical model has been valuable in the disc all overy of many techniques to successfully treat numerous diseases, it is no longer the dominating model of health in todays rules of order of battle. This model has been scrutinised for being too narrow-minded resulting in its inability to analyse different forms of distemper (Borrell-Carrio et al., 2004 Cockerham, 2007).Over the years, there have been massive health reforms, from morbific diseases such as puerperal fever, gonorrhoea, malaria and scurvy to the dominating chronic illnesses th at make hostelry today such as obesity, cardiovascular disease and diabetes (Tulchinsky Varavikova, 2000). The transition from infectious to chronic illnesses indicates that as time changes, strategies that have previously worked may non be as effective as they had once been. Hence, the cordial models were introduced.A psychiatrist named George Engel first proposed the favorable model, as he wanted to hurl a stop to the dehumanisation of the practice of medicine, and to give patients the power over their own health (Borrell-Carrio et al., 2004). Engel believed, that the hearty and physiological aspects of an individual played an burning(prenominal) role in relation to the illness procedure and and then, this model acts as an aid, to guide us through the numerous levels of organisation that affect diseases, ranging from the societal aspects to factors at the molecular level (Alonso, 2004 Borrell-Carrio et al., 2004). Since Engel first proposed this model, there have been m any variations of this model created such as the Dahlgren and Whiteheads model of health and the WHO accessible determinants of health framework.Social models place a strong furiousness on not solitary(prenominal) the biological aspects of disease nevertheless similarly the social and the psychological aspects of sickness, whereas, the Biomedical model is built around the demonstration and the symptoms of the disease of interest (Brown, 2005 Cleland Cotton, 2011). Hence, Social models of health have become more(prenominal) relevant over the last 150 years because of the changing society. As time passed, infectious diseases were no longer the major problem, with the problem now lying within the degenerative diseases such as cancer and purport disease present in todays society (Cleland Cotton, 2011). Therefore, the Biomedical model is no longer relevant as the development of these non-communicable diseases is multi-factorial and hence is not due to straightforward biological causes, nor can they be elderly easily (Cleland Cotton, 2011). For spate in society today, the experience of suffering from a disease is not just about the biochemical processes behind it, just now also about how the patients identify with this disease in terms of the things they are able to or unable to do, their emotions and the unmet requirements as a result of this disease (Jackson, Antonucci Brown, 2003). Hence, Social models are more widely accepted and relevant in society, as it recognises the multi-factorial causes associated with diseases such as obesity.Obesity is defined as the positive build-up of fat due to energy input being greater than energy expenditure, in technical terms, a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or over means that the individual will be ingested telling ( ball Health Organization WHO, 2014). The rates of obesity have been rapidly increase since the 1980s and not all the preponderance of obesity has been increasing merely the incidence of disease s associated with obesity has also been increasing (Finkelstein, Ruhm Kosa, 2005). Health consequences associated with obesity are non-communicable diseases such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes and other musculoskeletal diseases (WHO, 2014).The obesity epidemic is a major issue in society today and in 2008, of the 1.4 billion adults considered overweight, over 200 jillion males and nearly 300 million females were considered obese (WHO, 2014). In the early twentieth century, obesity was only scene to be present in develop countries such as China, Thailand and Mexico and only affected those with higher socioeconomic positions in the population however, this disease has shifted to affect those of lower socioeconomic position and globall(a)y, there is now more than 10% of the worlds population of adults considered obese (Callabero, 2007 WHO, 2014).The improvement in peoples living and working conditions has resulted in society having longer breeding spans due to the era dication of infectious diseases (Cockerham, 2007). However, the major issue facing society today is non-communicable diseases such as strokes, heart disease and cancer which all stem off obesity (Cockerham, 2007). Non-communicable diseases were originally thought to affect only the rich, but there is now an increasing trend in developing countries. If this trend continues to increase at the same pace, it is estimated by the year 2020, for every ten deaths, seven will be due to non-communicable diseases (Boutayeb, 2006). This transition from infectious diseases to chronic illnesses meant that the use of medicine became increasingly important in order to tackle these health issues and therefore, there has been little success in tackling these non-communicable diseases as the approaches they took in the past via the Biomedical model proves to be unfitting for the live situation (Cockerham, 2007).Social models have been effective in preventing this problem, as it takes into beak not o nly the biological causes of these health conditions associated with obesity, but also social factors such as dietary brainchild and physical action mechanism. An individuals lifestyle is vital towards their health as it is a relevant social mechanism that needs to be considered when approaching these diseases (Cockerham, 2007). Over the years, the dietary intake of individuals has change magnitude, with people consuming more sweetened beverages and processed meals and consuming less healthy wholesome foods such as fruits and vegetables (Callabero, 2007). Research reveals an inversely comparative relationship exists between the availability of fast food outlets and the socioeconomic locating of the individual, with individuals in lower socioeconomic areas being 2.5 times more heart-to-heart to fast food chains compared to those in higher socioeconomic areas, and this social gradient indicates that a decreasing socioeconomic status results in an increased chance of obesity (Reid path, Burns, Garrard, Mahoney Townsend, 2002). This brings about inequality between those of low socioeconomic status and those with high socioeconomic status, further reiterating that there must be other factors apart from biological components, which bring about diseases. Physical activity has also decreased with people opting for more sedentary lifestyles, for example, it was predicted that less than 30 percent of the US population had a suitable level of exercise, other 30 percent were involved in physical activity but not enough, while the remainder had adapted to sedentary lifestyles (Callabero, 2007). It is habits such as these that has attributed to the individuals susceptibility or resistance to these illnesses (Cockerham, 2007). Only Social models of health can take into consideration of these habits as well as the social gradients shown to help us to understand their influences towards these illnesses that stem off obesity. more complex factors are interacting with one another, causing the increase in prevalence of health conditions associated with obesity (Candib, 2007). Therefore, Social models are effective in explaining this phenomenon as it recognises the importance of social factors and how they contribute to health conditions such as cardiovascular disease. Social factors such as the individuals surrounding environs can either reverse or increase the biological gamble of diseases making the Biomedical model inadequate as it does not consider anything but the biological cause (Cockerham, 2007). An environment that has contributed hugely to this increasing prevalence is an obesogenic environment this is essentially a setting that encourages sedentary lifestyles promoting food inlet and discouraging exercise, which eventually leads to an increased risk of obesity (Reidpath et al., 2002). Social models are therefore efficient as it considers how we can eliminate such influences in order to reduce the multi-factorial effects associated with t he obesity epidemic by unite the formerly separated characteristics of illness (Cleland Cotton, 2011 Jackson et al., 2003). It helps us to efficiently extend the significant contributions of multiple factors outside the biological sense that drives the increasing prevalence of health conditions associated with obesity.To conclude, health is one of the most important aspects of human life and can be affected by factors that are not ceaselessly biological components. As a result, the multidimensional Social models were created to allow a better understanding of the diseases, such as obesity, that affect our society (Borrell-Cario et al., 2004). However, because society is constantly changing there is no perfect model for health that exists and therefore we must seek new ideas that we can incorporate in our models with the hopes that it will be applicable to the changing society.Reference ListAlonso, Y. (2004). The biopsychosocial model in medical research the evolution of the hea lth concept over the last two decades.Patient education and counseling,53(2), 239-244. inside 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00146-0Browne, K. (2005). Health and Illness. An introduction to sociology, 3, 397-415. Retrieved from http//www.library.auckland.ac.nz.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/ereserves/2144315b.pdfBorrell-Carrio, F., Suchman, A. L., Epstein, R. M. (2004). The Biopsychosocial Model 25 Years Later Principles, Practice, and Scientific Inquiry. Annals of Family music, 2(6), 576-582. Retrieved from http//www.annfammed.org.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/content/2/6/576.full.pdfBoutayeb, A. (2006). The double burden of communicable and non-communicable diseases in developing countries.Transactions of the magnificent society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene,100(3), 191-199. Retrieved from http//trstmh.oxfordjournals.org.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/content/100/3/191.fullCallabero, B. (2007). The spheric Epidemic of Obesity An Overview. Epidemiological Review, 29, 1-5. doi 10.1093/epirev/mxm012Cleland, J., Cotton, P. (Eds.). (2011).Health, Behaviour and Society clinical Medicine in Context. SAGE. Retrieved from http//books.google.co.nz/books?hl=enlr=id=BuZpuJSlNRMCoi=fndpg=PP2dq=Jennifer+Cleland,+Philip+Cotton.+(2011).+Health,+Behaviour+and+Society+Clinical+Medicine+in+Context.+ots=CSbguqMTZlsig=TvNhB4GJdQnp8m-enuFPer6J2Qgv=onepageq=modelf=falseCockerham, W.C. (2007). The social causation of health and disease. Social causes of health and disease, 1-24. Retrieved from http//www.library.auckland.ac.nz.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/ereserves/2130941b.pdfFinkelstein, E. A., Ruhm, C. J., Kosa, K. M. (2005). Economic causes and consequences of obesity.Annu. Rev. Public Health,26, 239-257. doi 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144628Jackson, J. J., Antonucci, T. C., Brown, E. (2003). A cultural lens on biopsychosocial models of aging.Advances in cell aging and gerontology,15, 221-241. Retrieved from http//books.google.co.nz/books?hl=enlr=id=kBXLPaaXPKcCoi=fndpg=PA221dq=%22biopsychosocia l+models+of+health%22ots=ToNciaJ7sosig=fZmma3Fai9VhqZm5xhCPS1oEy_wv=onepageq=%22biopsychosocial%20models%20of%20health%22f=falseJames, P. T., Leach, R., Kalamara, E., Shayeghi, M. (2001). The worldwide obesity epidemic.Obesity research,9(S11), 228S-233S. Retrieved from http//onlinelibrary.wiley.com.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/doi/10.1038/oby.2001.123/fullReidpath, D., Burns C., Garrard J., Mahoney, M., Townsend, M. (2002). An bionomic study of the relationship between social and environmental determinants of obesity. Health and Place, 8, 141-145. doi 10.1016/S1353-8292(01)00028-4Tulchinsky, T. H., Varavikova, E. A. (2000). The New Public Health an introduction for the 21st Century. San Diego Academic Press.World Health Organization. (2014). Obesity and Overweight. Retrieved from http//www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/1