The Merchant of Venice Antonio's trial (Act 4) Essay

The Merchant of Venice Antonios trial (Act 4) - Essay Examples a few out(predicate) tasks like asking the tides non to rise, expecting the wolf to show pity to the ewe and not to devour the lamb, and to expect the firs not to make noise when the wind blows throw them, and then goes on to say that these argon easily through with(p) as compared to expecting loan shark to be merciful. shylock answers to the accusation by stating that he is no less uncouth than the rest of the so called civilized men present there. He states how these people mistreat their slaves and how none of them would envisage of treating them on equal footing with themselves. He then asks why it is that he is expected to forego his bastinado of flesh when they do not forfeit their slaves.Analyze the factores of argument used and identify these with those that both moneylender used & the lawyer (Portia) used. Consider the key factors as presented in your text book (Beyond feelings by Vicent Ryab Ruggiero eigh th edition) - both the positive & negative forms of argument.The arguments that Antonio uses to state why it is useless to expect blessing from Shylock are negative. It is easy to see how he builds the premise to prove that Shylock is heard-hearted. The stated premise here is that impracticable things can be achieved more easily than to get Shylock to change his heart. The Conclusion being that Shylock will not change his mind, for he is merciless.When Portia and Shylock argue later on, Portia first of all uses favourable argument towards showing mercy, which Shylock simply denies by using the negative argument, which is that the law allows him to get the tie enforced, so there is no need for mercy.Portia uses affirmative arguments, whereas Antonio shows negative arguments towards a show of mercy. Portia states why Shylock should be merciful whereas Antonio avers how Shylock would not be merciful.Shylocks own arguments remain the same, whether he is arguing with Portia or with A ntonio. His premise is simple that as he is not required to show mercy under any law,